He disputes the emails claiming they are made up and tampered with insinuating his partner in selling these CDs has implicated him to get a lesser sentence.
Obviously someone in this whole mess is lying or grossly misinformed, the problem is figuring out who.
He said he had IT-experts testify in court that the emails had been tampered with, I assume one could look into that in some kind of public record over the case?
Obviously someone in this whole mess is lying or grossly misinformed, the problem is figuring out who.
He said he had IT-experts testify in court that the emails had been tampered with, I assume one could look into that in some kind of public record over the case?