KLexpat
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
but yeah it wasn't that great anywhere south of cancun or cairo
They killed far more than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesian_mass_killings_of_19... 1965–1966, 500k - 1m
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Laos
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Cambodia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Myanmar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_squads_in_El_Salvador "The paramilitaries committed the vast majority of murders and massacres during the civil war and were heavily aligned with the United States-backed government"
Doesn't mesh well with washington kissinger pastiche though
The problem with this tech isn't just the Übermensch (or should I say, ÜberTiāncháo) that we will have to deal with, but more subtle. For instance, a percentage of northern europeans are already partially genetically immune to HIV/AIDS [1]
People with sickle cell anaemia are already somewhat immune to Malaria [2]. Some gibbering genius in a laboratory might decide to cure the human race of Anaemia and inadvertently cause millions of people to start dying of malaria or dengue.
There are plenty of "problem" genes that we carry in our genome that scientists will want to "fix", and then we will discover the hard way why those genes are there in the first place. This absolutely needs to be controlled. The coming man will not be an Übermensch, but a CRISPR-castrato
[1] https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/viruses101/hiv_resistan... [2] https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/biology/index.html (select 'sickle cell')
End of the day though -- why should my speech be held as responsible for another persons conduct?
But lets not be retarded about this, the point is more that they are using a puritan argument about the word retard in a retarded manner in order to shut down discourse, to try and retard the share price of a stock, which has had absolutely retarded performance lately.
Please forgive me if this is a stupid question, this is not my knowledge domain.
"The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 134, No 1, January 2021", Page 18, shows a treatment algorithm for Covid-19-like and confirmed Covid-19 illness, specifying 200mg of Hydroxochloroquine for patients over the age of 50 or with a single comorbidity.
I'm not talking about the primary study on HCQ, but the treatment algorithm is recent.
I thought this was quite interesting; after considerable negative coverage in the news-media, now an article in the American Journal of Medicine has recommended treatment of 200mgof Hydroxochloroquine per day for Covid-19 patients.
Negative media coverage has continued until quite recently:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/24/opinion/hydroxychloroquin...