JoshPurtell

There could be a leak from post-training but not pre-training

gpt oss 20b is not dense

Codex is not far behind Claude Code

You most certainly should not have stuck with Conda

Have been testing this in dev and really like the performance so far

I concede that it is not precisely OSS. But if I tell someone that it is source-available, they will expect some kind of license restriction for any use. If I tell someone OSS, they will expect mostly what the Sentry license entails, unless they are a competitor, in which case I really don't care what they think.

I wish there were a popular term that conveys exactly how Sentry license works. But, there isn't - so I think it's fair to say open source, maybe as a general term. I'll change it from OSS to open source

What compile times do you work with? I use bazel and it still hurts

Billionaires and corporations can hire teams of people to work for them full-time. You, likely, can hire one or two (or zero!). Not to make it personal.

These inequalities already exist

I do both and compile times are very unfriendly to AI!

Why, because of the Sentry license?

Every AI advancement liberates real humans from drudgery and allows them to create what they want more easily.

The invention of the digital calculator turned human calculators into accountants, and that's great! We're contributing to the same process now

Monty is the missing link that's made me ship my rust-based RLM implementation - and I'm certain it'll come in handy in plenty of other contexts.

Just beware of panics!