Johnyjohnson123

I see your point itll be very jagged but llms are definitely very innovative. See the recent .ath proofs etc.

But i agree thinking will remain important. As my grandpa put it if something breaks who'll go and fix it ?

Yellow, yours ?

Shouldve bee the man instea dof chuck norris

Hahahaha

If user data would become such a key ingredient (which it might, i actually remember noam shazeer talking about the importance of user data), i think chinese labs can still get it from china, as keep in mind it ahs a billion people behind the great firewall banned from using us llms. And btw broadly for any gap like this, you really gotta consider that if its becoming a bottleneck, chinese labs will find a way to buy it from one of the labs unless theres strict regulation at the government level

Thanks for sharing.

Is lack of inference chips due to the trading blocks by trump administration? What if Trump agrees to sell chips to china, would they collapse then? That's not a very strong position to be at

People who say vitamin d isnt important should read about auld rickie...

Could barely understand the 1900 one

I don't think they explain it in the paper, do they? They just mention the result it seems. I am really curious to know too. Maybe they imply it's the result of their Mixture Of Experts architecture? Or maybe they just don't wanna say, idk

I'm not sure what's allowed. Can use current seconds in someone's watch, for example? Or maybe ask some random person to say a random word, and then use the position of the first letter of that word in the alphabet? This sounds like a really fun problem but I'm certain about the rules.

this is the nerdiest thing I've heard in my life, haha