Jerrrrrrry
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
We are pawns, hoping to be maybe a Rook to the King by endgame.
Some think we can promote our pawns to Queens to match.
Luckily, the Jester muses!
Good compression, by definition, would leave small artifacts in the data, biasing it away from "true" randomness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon%E2%80%93Hartley_theore...
>This almost worked, but I found that the first chunk was always failing to transmit through the firewall
Magic numbers/header scanning or, if it was awhile back, BOM (byte order mark) messing stuff up.Nuance;
> The audience here skews towards those the truth.
The truth is that this sentence is believed by every audience ever convened.
Actually you are correct, I should had known better to type "truth", as if a thing existed.This site definitely skews towards objectivity.
>I quit since.
apparently they have too :)Other side promote engagement. This site still rewards discourse.
Of course, the ones that cannot tolerate any dissenting opinion will either whine or leave.
It's best to paste that encrypted payload into a JPG with some bullshit magic headers and upload that to a trusted Exfil pivot instead.
Or, to get SuperMarioKart.rom to work with your chromeApp-XEMU emulator to play during down-time at work, just rename it to SMB.png, and email it you yourself.
>'thinking' vs 'just recombinating things
If there is a difference, and LLM's can do one but not the other... >By that standard (and it is a good standard), none of these "AI" things are doing any thinking
>"Does it generalize past the training data" has been a pre-registered goalpost since before the attention transformer architecture came on the scene.
Then what the fuck are they doing.Learning is thinking, reasoning, what have you.
Move goalposts, re-define words, it won't matter.