JamesHinnek
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
If someone is being paid more, this person has to work more, I have seen so many people becoming managers just to actually avoid work, or thinking that tech is too hard and too much to study. So they instead go to a whole different area where most of your previous knowledge won't be required anymore, and they don't think that they are starting from zero, so they just don't study and read 2 blog articles and think that they got how is to work with people.
The first step I always think that is being honestly concerned and caring about people and making them the best that they can be without toxic behavior and then balance it with company expectations and project management skills.
Folks complain that this is too much to learn, but this is the reason why managers get paid more. Not the case in the real world, unfortunately
A reminder that your pay corresponds with your expected skills, hiring a top 1% de offering market average, is a delusion. But the interview process is out of control for devs, and basically non-existent for managers.
Ps: I'm a manager, so I can say that I'm overpaid for what I deliver, while devs are underpaid and the expectation on them is out of reality.
I'd nowhere near the same performance with oxen. The analysis is very biased to help Oxen. I wish people had more integrity before trying so hard to push a half-baked product into the market.
These tools are not mature enough, no automated decision making process should leverage these tools without human intervention, especially when handling other humans. I'm not saying all LLM models are bad, I'm saying I'm talking about their architectural foundation, which is prone to these problems.
Our measurement was the rate of losing customers compared with them opening tickets complaining about some issue. We had roughly 12x more losses when using the LLM as a replacement for our support team in our A/B test.