JPLeRouzic

An article entirely written with AI (as past ones) is claiming that a new type of AI surpasses the current AI, isn't paradoxical?

> "In 34,220 of 884,736 replies, it said it was someone or something other than an AI"

It therefore provides a correct answer in 96% of cases, and displays a sense of humor in the remaining cases.

Healthcare is more than having medical knowledge.

Ten years ago, in France, two doctors (one in a professional setting and the other during a private consultation) asked me about a wound I had on my shoulder; obviously I couldn't identify what it was, and they offered no suggestions, so I supposed it was not something important.

It took a visit to a cardiologist—for an entirely different reason—for him to suggest that I rapidly consult a dermatologist.

It was a carcinoma, and surgery removed it. If ChatGPT had existed back then, this carcinoma would have been removed several years earlier.

Thank you, that an excellent idea and an excellent execution!

But I wonder why when someone types 'medicine' there is only 6 proposals while when someone type 'physics' there is 447 proposals?

Thank you @squantor

Thanks @FrankPetrilli.

Please can you provide some links to intro level articles?

That looks interesting, what technology "lifts signals out of thermal noise"?