Ilnsk

Yeah ok but most science doesn't need a supercollider. Most of the erroneous science is in the social sciences, psych especially, and there really isn't any equivalent of a supercollider in psychology. The only possible equivalent is a massive study of like 200+ subjects but once you're at that scale you can be pretty confident that your statistics have converged, anyway. The real issue is low sample size(<100 although most studies done are <30) psychology studies which are by and large relatively easy to reproduce.

What's up with all of the namecheap bots in this thread? There are like 10 accounts defending namecheap like their lives depended on it.

Go back to Lesswrong.

Free and open source until you have enough users to start locking off premium features and charging for a subscription lol.

I wish I were a cloud person.

>A man stuck in snow did not have a mobile phone signal to call for help. He typed an SMS into his phone, attached it to his drone and, once airborne, the phone found a signal, and help for him and two other stranded people arrived.

Pay $400 to a plaintiff so that he can then make $100 mil in a law suit that alleges representation of you.

xkcd.com/642

Can I run NVim on it?

It really isn't that important for most people though, most people are only looked at in terms of large aggregate metrics, most people don't feel that participation in a survey constitutes a violation of one's privacy, why are large aggregate marketing statistics any different?

This is a fantastic response. Just wondering, if they exist, what would you say are the broad overlaps between anesthesiology and QM are? I know Stuart Hameroff, another anesthesiologist, did a bunch of speculative work on the Orch OR front, so I'd assume there must be some connection of ag least some quality that makes both fields attractive to the same kind of person.