Recent submissions

Comment · 10 days ago
Comment · 25 days ago
That reminds me of the Richards Tip episode from Nathan for You, in which, in order to fulfill a legal requirement for a name change, they started printing a newspaper called The Diarrhea Times.
Comment · 1 month ago
Flash didn't use JS, but rather ActionScript. Which was very much inspired by ECMAScript, especially AS3 -- but Flash's security holes were all of Adobe's doing. Good times.
Comment · 1 month ago
Did you work on BB10?
Comment · 1 month ago
It's more of a gut feeling than anything else. I don't know what the normalization rules are, but I think we mostly notice the normalizer when it mangles something [1], and not when it's just quietly humming along. Someone with more spare time could probably figure out a dataset of original to normalized titles and measure that.

[1]: Example from the frontpage right now: "How Big Are Factorials?" probably got normalized to "Big Are Factorials?" originally, based off other previous manglings I have seen previously.

Comment · 1 month ago
In its (admittedly weak) defense, if the submitter edits the title back during the few-minute window after submitting where this is possible, the normalizer does not kick back in. But it is a bit opaque, in the sense that the poster needs to: realize that the title has been changed; know that they can edit the title (but not too slow!); and know that it won't be filtered through again.

I have no idea what the website would look like without it, but I have a feeling it does more good than harm.

Comment · 1 month ago
I believe the "This" might have gotten swallowed by HN's title normalizer.
Comment · 1 month ago
I am trying very hard to find an original version of this cipher with no luck. It almost sounds like this whole thing is a hallucination...? Can anyone point me to a PDF of the original Cyphral Distich as printed?
Comment · 1 month ago
Couldn't you put !.gitignore et al in your global config file?
Comment · 3 months ago
FWIW, the Original version looks misaligned on my Linux phone running Firefox. Fixed is, well, fixed.
Comment · 4 months ago
It means they rebased all their changes on top of the new version. This is usually time-consuming because AOSP is not developed in the open, so you can't do this incrementally as things change -- you just get a massive drop sometime after release.
Comment · 5 months ago
No, they got it booting on bare metal a few posts down.
Comment · 5 months ago
Comment · 5 months ago
You should probs edit out the spoiler, or encode it somehow for others who haven't watched it yet!

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton