Gisbitus

I'm not 100% sure, but I think that the entire toolbox is open source, whereas some presets and pre-made components are still behind the paywall.

So, in theory, nothing is stopping you from recreating them from scratch.

Reading their landing page, the product was only recently open-sourced, so I believe that explains the mismatch.

Hard agree on this. I feel like it's pretty normal, but I struggle with retaining information by just reading. I really need the manual typing step to cement the knowledge.

Their homepage features a download button, with all the platforms listed, as the first thing when you open it.

I understand the feedback in the second paragraph, however I do not understand why we're judging projects by whether they've been AI generated or not.

Have we stopped treating software as a black box? This behavior will only lead to devs moving away from OSS to avoid the AI stigma.

I don't know if you're based in the US, but here in Europe I used Xometry and, while expensive for what you're getting, it was pretty reasonable.

I built a cyberdeck bigger than this and the case came out to be around 30 euros.

Absolutely hilarious name

This post was a wake up call. Last year I spent a week learning Swift the "old fashioned way" following Apple's tutorials, with not much to show for it when I was done. Even though I use AI for coding daily, since XCode doesn't natively support it, I just decided to not use it.

Seeing how far you went in just a couple of days, I realize now how much I missed out.

Congrats on the app!

It's OSS, so there isn't an "official" hosted version, but someone probably is gonna offer it soon.

Just like it's mentioned later in the article: it doesn't really matter if you get an addition mostly right. You either get it right or you don't. I still appreciate their effort though, because even after altering the grading system, there were still some emergent abilities.