Doctor_Fegg
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Deferring to Government naming is only one possible approach. OpenStreetMap takes another: “the name that people use on the ground”. The Gulf of Mexico is still the Gulf of Mexico in OSM and will remain so until popular parlance changes.
OSM's sharealike provision has never been about making the project "viral". Free map data is enough to do that by itself.
OSM's sharealike provision is, and always has been, unambiguously aimed at stopping bigcos killing the project by scooping up the map data then contributing nothing back - the scenario where Schmoogle Maps takes all OSM's footpath data, combines it with their own motor-centric, sensor-fuelled dataset to create the one map to rule them all, and thereby attracts the flow of new contributors that OSM needs to survive.
https://osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesI...
Lots of people did, in fact, consider this.
https://www.systemeD.net/