Doches
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
I found this closing sentence utterly delightful, particularly in an age of endlessly filtering every piece of text I read on the internet through a mental "was this written by Claude, Codex, or (just possibly) a human?" filter.
Seriously, though — if the history is valuable and interesting, include it. If it provides context in general, include it; if it’s just overconfident marketing fluff straight from the parrot’s mouth, drop it. I like my READMEs to open with the ‘why’ of the project: why I built it and why you might need it too.
Knowing I’ll never again check and find a year’s crop of perfect sentences dims the light more than I would have expected. Sad times.
The project README reads like a first draft straight out of Claude, and it's incredibly off-putting. The 'Show HN' post here is so much better; clearly you're capable of writing a decent explanation of what this project is, its history, and for whom you've built it. Take the time and write the damn README yourself.
If you expect human attention, put in human effort.
You're a sophomore at UT, so as a UTCS alum (:wave: from a fellow Turing Scholar) I'm not letting you off the hook. Unless things have majorly changed, I know you're taking 6 hours of writing-heavy coursework.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/3856240/Pieces_of_the_Kin...
Yes, this is weird and no, I have no idea why we do it, but it’s really weird to read “export it to east Texas” — to the extent that I had to re-parse the sentence to figure out what you meant.
Email me at [email protected]