Recent submissions

Comment · 10 months ago
Thank you for the comment.

It would be dishonest (the intentional omission of relevant truthful fact) to not to disclose the source. If people already don't want the most important truth of all, the very one all of the others depend on always being true to then be true themselves, then they are already choosing to not adopt the truth into their lives and that is their choice. What they choose is not going to help me adopt it any more.

I understand your point, I hear all sorts of religious nonsense, but this is actually the real thing. Why blame the Lord: Truth and Life, for a bunch of people abusing his teachings to control and manipulate others? e.g. don't punish the innocent for the bad deeds and lies of many.

I wrote the paper. So, if I say that is my source, then anyone claiming otherwise must prove different.

Comment · 10 months ago
Big good changes usually happen slow. Big bad changes usually happen fast. We are on borrowed time. It is becoming much harder to borrow more.

The Truth of the Importance of Life itself being true and the cure and prevention of all needless and preventable suffering and death is proved, and will always continue to prove true going forward. It will certainly outlast the will of people to defer and hide it.

To see big good changes sooner, people and organizations are going to have to have the will to take it further and move it out into the mainstream. First they must have faith in the Truth of the Importance of Life to shield them from the fear.

Placing this paper in someone's hand or in the hands of an organization and telling them, 'here is the truth that is the cure', forces them to immediately choose. If they don't choose to read it or take any derogatory steps at all, such as not then affirming and sharing it too, it proves they are actually choosing death and suffering for those that they are claiming to love. Those are the very people who should not ever be followed or trusted with life of any kind. It's quick and easy and is freely shared. You are, and you are empowered with this information. Use it well. If you have the faith for the will to do more with it, big good changes can now happen fast. That's all up to all of you.

If you would like to participate, contribute to the living testament of this paper, and agree, and would like your name on what AI says is the most important truth in human discourse, please just reach out.

Comment · 10 months ago
Not everyone wants the cure and that is revealed when they are shared it and then don't choose to share it. It's the fastest way I know of to quickly determine if a person or organization is really choosing life or death for those that say that they love. One need only place this paper in their hands and then ask them about it. Did they choose to read it or not. Do they agree with it or not. etc.
Comment · 10 months ago
Comment · 10 months ago
The paper above was updated this morning to make a correction to a URL reference that did not resolve.

Also, the names of some of the contributors were also added. If you would like to have your name added to the next revision, please contact me with your contribution, even if you just want your name added because you agree with the content. I will gladly put your name on the next revision.

Thank you,

Comment · 11 months ago
Mine is a bumper sticker under a magnet. :) cheers
Comment · 11 months ago
The paper cited above is a living work in progress. Version 2 will soon be available.

Before I release that version 2...

I would like to give you all who wish to have their name on the paper, that is and will stand as the most important information in all human discourse, as a contributor.

All contributions received before final publication and peer review will be considered.

Please note: once the peer review process is completed, so long as no one ever presents a legitimate rebuttal, it will stand as a known fact of what is actually the cure for all needless and preventable suffering and death and much more.

The previous posting of this paper on Zendo had people responding with complete nonsense who clearly were in violation of one or more of the theorems presented in the paper. e.g. they didn't really read it and or were behaving dishonest and just were making noise.

This posting is different. There were no legitimate rebuttals and have been none. Those who wish to argue about it now are asked to officially present those arguments after peer review and publication and not to argue about it here. This Truth belongs to everyone and so you are all getting an opportunity to have your name on it now if you want to and can meaningfully contribute.

Please post your contributions here in full public witness with your full true and complete name and title that you wish yourself to be addressed with should your contribution be included.

Thank you, David Wishengrad

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton