DHMO
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
So, instead of "no first use", I would just have a global agreement never to have or use nuclear weapons for any reason, not even for defense.
Nuclear pulse propulsion should be allowed for spacecraft, however. This was outlawed years ago by the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_Nuclear_Test_Ban_Treat... but would be much more efficient than other currently used methods and safe if used with clean bombs in space. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_pulse_propulsion
Weapons by their nature will continue to escalate as long as technology improves, so if nuclear weapons continue to be allowed, time will surely bring a weapon even more destructive to counter them. Whether you believe they've brought peace or not, do you want someone to invent an even greater weapon and test it as the next "weapon of peace"? I don't.
And others have also set off the bomb: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests
Granted, weapons testing is a little different than intentional use in war against an enemy.
But just because that is true for a number of people doesn't mean it is true for all.
I don't work from home anymore, but, personally, I always felt happiest when working from home.
I did have a remote job which sucked, and part of it was because it was remote and I didn't have as much familiarity with the code or the company and part of it was that the job just really sucked.
I think though that if you are already familiar with the code, know the people you are working with well, don't have significant problems interpreting what others say via IM/email and need to speak with them in person to get context, and just get a total morale boost when working from home because you are in your own world and can concentrate better, then- please!- work from home!
I understand the association with up and optimism, but in this document, I think that it could be distracting the reader from the content you are presenting.
Thank you for writing this, though!
"...calculations in semiclassical gravity suggest that quantum effects may be able to violate this condition in curved spacetime. Although it was hoped recently that quantum effects could not violate an achronal version of the averaged null energy condition, violations have nevertheless been found, so it remains an open possibility that quantum effects might be used to support a wormhole."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne#Wormholes_and_time_...
Wormholes for matter and energy are not incompatible with physics. We just probably won't ever see one like the one he proposed, because creating it would require manipulation of matter or gravity at extreme scale.
But, it is wrong to say it is impossible. It is theoretically possible.
No, it's perfectly valid for a drug to only have affect on the growing fetus but where there were not studies proving harm to the child or adult, e.g. Thalidomide.
http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/05/02/scan...
And, don't forget to talk with HR at work if you don't think you'll get fired to see whether there is a way to reduce distractions. Many are more-than-willing to help- whether it's with buying some noise-cancelling earbuds, relocating you, letting you work from home, or another option. If it's a team member or more that is noisy or distracts you, mention that to your manager or HR.
You can go a long way helping yourself.
Here's what I feel about each Windows release I've used much (1=low, 10=high):
* - marred by experience w/Surface RT