BlackCherry
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
Those humans who recalled incorrectly could have a 130 IQ, proving my point above and making your ad hominem reddit speak luddite insult fall flat.
If I were to use something like this, it'd be for rapid development initially for prototyping purposes. Then I'd transition to something more bespoke as needed.
If you know all your requirements up front, then starting bespoke from the beginning may be the better route.
https://www.nscai.gov/about/commissioners
Eric Schmidt, Chairman Schmidt Futures
Robert O. Work, Vice Chairman TeamWork
Safra Catz Oracle
Steve Chien Jet Propulsion Lab
Mignon Clyburn MLC Strategies
Chris Darby In-Q-Tel
Eric Horvitz Microsoft Research
Andy Jassy Amazon Web Services
Andrew Moore Google
William Mark SRI
Gilman Louie Alsop Louie Partners
Jason Matheny Georgetown University
Katharina McFarland Chair, National Academies of Science Board of Army Research and Development
Ken Ford Florida Institute for Human & Machine Cognition
José-Marie Griffiths Dakota State University
So by your own logic alone this technology should be dismantled.
You defer to a fantasy utilitarian argument, where the material interests of the average human right now should be subjugated to possible technological advancement. This makes your moral and ethical compass devoid of any humanity. This is truly a horrifying set of morals you have put forth.
It also demonstrates how disconnected from the average person he was if he almost only saw OSX, when the market was 95%+ Windows.