ArashPartow

You're absolutely right, formal computational geometry is more biased towards exact algorithms and their associated complexities - specifically solving problems that more often than not have a geometric structure associated with them.

It is however fun from time to time to have some visual tangible results too otherwise things do get a bit dry.

@signa11 thanks for the note.

btw I've added a whole lot more examples since the last time, and I've also updated the library itself.

Thanks! - btw if you have any ideas for other examples please do let me know, I'm very eager to add more interesting yet also accessible examples.

I've reviewed some of the code from your port, and it seems like you've forgotten to carry the one in a few places.