6LLvveMx2koXfwn

I was hoping I was the DevOps/Platform/SRE plugin for my agents!

. . . and I'm a contrarian mofo so even when the suggestions are exactly what I want I now need to think of something different to say!

I wonder who's going to pay for that extra 120 years of living we're gonna be doing?

It's almost like the primary objective is to make money rather than 'protect the children'.

It's not really a case of 'winning' though is it? There is no agreed criteria by which to judge which is going to pass muster for a majority of people (both in Socrates time and ours).

I think (?) my point was that Socrates equated Memory with Wisdom, and the invention of writing would impact Memory and thus Wisdom. I believe he was just plain wrong. Equating (manual) coding/code-review with Wisdom makes the same category error.

> The problem imo is the slow deterioration of institutional knowledge that offloading the mental task of wisdom gathering to AI is causing.

I believe this is what Socrates said (verbatim) about the invention of writing.

Very skeptical - the source material is

    studies published between 2022 and 2025 that examined the use of GenAI in relation to students

If GenAI = LLMs then ChatGPT made public release in October 2022 which gives precisely zero time to generate data on impact in students. Also

    173 records (studies) were included in the review

Really? 173 peer reviewed studies based on this niche in less than 3 years. I shudder to think the quality of those constituent studies. Not questioning the results just the means of getting them.

Unlike me, 56 and yet to be wrong once.

I would totally subscribe to a print edition.