0mbre

odd. I've contacted them. Thanks for the input

thanks for the input, tbh my expectation were pretty low to start with :D

I am thinking since my account hasn't posted in a while they might have an automated mechanic in place cause I am sure this wasn't a human action. It was instant.

done. thank you

I dont think thats it cause it was instant, in a non human time.

Thanks for the input though

I've deleted the previous one. It does look like that, but it's not (wouldn't take you long to find out why too)

Thanks for the links!

I'd be curious to see an example of code that looks bad but yet is easy to grasp mentally. I do think these 2 features that you describe "easy to run mentally" and "look good" are correlated.

A software's usefulness is not correlated to how well it was architected. What I like about Laravel is that its fairly complex code base that is mostly composed of tiny and expressive functions

At some point in Martins book, he mentioned a forgotten codebase from one of his friend that was solely composed of tiny functions but yet achieve a fairly complex effect. That's the kind of feeling I had working at Laravel (admittedly it's been a few years). React codebase, on the other hand, seem less human-friendly, it seems to require some prior knowledge of the code to be able to dive into.