"they're probably wasting more money because the codebase is terrible."
A terrible code base that serves customers is better than a beautiful codebase that goes unused.
I think your criteria is expressed poorly. Perhaps you meant that bad developers are unable to produce code that serves customers well? Add in, a terrible product. (Product != codebase)
A terrible code base that serves customers is better than a beautiful codebase that goes unused. I think your criteria is expressed poorly. Perhaps you meant that bad developers are unable to produce code that serves customers well? Add in, a terrible product. (Product != codebase)