Comment

Comment by rwaldron

> These aren't really what the author claims.

As the author, I can assure you they are what I claim them to be: Points in the source code that identify some issue in some browser.

> The first two are actually the same thing,

Whoops! I thought I had removed the first one. Thanks for the bug report. The second is true, we received bug reports when we used we had issues with "use strict" in Firefox. I removed the first one anyway.

> The third is just noting that a jQuery function doesn't work in some contexts.

Wrong, it's a note about IE reporting the wrong value.

> The fourth and fifth (which, like #1, are two lines from the same comment) are just documenting a try/catch block because something jQuery is doing might throw an exception.

Because a particular browser has abnormal behaviour.

> The seventh is just an attribute named "support".

I thought removed that. It matched "support:", so you're still wrong.

> So far it looks like this isn't actually a list of reasons you will need jQuery

Accept that it does with the exception of two things I thought I had removed.

You owe me an apology.

parent rwaldron 12 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton