rwaldron

That's correct, but only half correct :)

Johnny-Five programs can run on board any SBC that runs Linux and can support Node.js. For those platforms, GPIO and serial bus interfaces are interacted with directly; examples include Raspberry Pi, Intel Edison (+Galileo 1 & 2, Joule), Tessel 2, Linino and pcDuino

"linting" is subjective, preferential—not required.

Python built linting into the language itself and it's super annoying.

> behaviour is well defined.

True, and we could go one step further: it's unambiguously defined, with invariant rules that can be used to prove a conformant implementation.

> Looks like it's been fixed in ES5

That was published 9 years ago.

9999999999999999 > Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER === true

JavaScript numbers are IEEE754 double precision floating point format.

PL = Programming Language

Actually, 4 years ago and then again 3 years ago I said it was a total disaster. I have mountains of email reports from an audit of the project.

You're conflating "JavaScript the programming language" with "DOM, the awful sack of shit".

Don't do that.

I absolutely agree with this. Several years ago I did the same exercise with Zepto, which definitively disproved its compatibility claim.

Yes, performance comparisons, but those could've been measurements of no-op versions of functions by the same name.

There isn't a single test for this project. How can its claims of jQuery-alike-ness be supported?

Tests, or it doesn't exist.

If Facebook made use of smart OCAP practices, none of that would be possible. Use of object identity as a "security key" would prevent code that doesn't have access to the "key" object from being successful.

Boooorrrrring.

Open Wash.