> If something is that dangerous, shouldn't there be armored escorts, lojacks and all sorts of other security measures on it?
I think you underestimate just how common this and similarly dangerous chemical substances are. Every large hospital that does radiation therapy has this stuff.
> Isn't it criminally liable to transport something this lethal so carelessly?
You probably mean "criminally negligent", and I don't think the "standard of care" criterium extends to defending against malicious third party actions.
I think you underestimate just how common this and similarly dangerous chemical substances are. Every large hospital that does radiation therapy has this stuff.
> Isn't it criminally liable to transport something this lethal so carelessly?
You probably mean "criminally negligent", and I don't think the "standard of care" criterium extends to defending against malicious third party actions.