I see. Somehow I missed that paper. I've seen it referred to, but never in a form where I could find it.
And now I'm even more confused. Why is this so critical that we can't say we're going to put it in another next version of the standard? Compile is regularly see things in the future version of standards and them implement early. I'm not disagreeing with the paper. I'm disagreeing that this is so critical it needs to abort the whole process.
And now I'm even more confused. Why is this so critical that we can't say we're going to put it in another next version of the standard? Compile is regularly see things in the future version of standards and them implement early. I'm not disagreeing with the paper. I'm disagreeing that this is so critical it needs to abort the whole process.