Technically the workers are supposed to express any grievance(s) to on-site stewards, who then coordinate with Union leadership.
I never once saw an on-site steward.
Leaving 520 after the 2.5%->4.5% "dues" increase was among many pyrrhic victories (it was to cover aging healthcare expenditures, which is now making more sense these years later).
Eventually Unions will need sub-unions, separate from their own current LU-management – if only to keep the actual workers working.
I never once saw an on-site steward.
Leaving 520 after the 2.5%->4.5% "dues" increase was among many pyrrhic victories (it was to cover aging healthcare expenditures, which is now making more sense these years later).
Eventually Unions will need sub-unions, separate from their own current LU-management – if only to keep the actual workers working.