Comment

Comment by dang

We're not an employer, but I've been referring to these links lately, when trying to persuade emailers not to do that to us either. (It doesn't seem to have helped much, so far...)

It will be an uncommon choice not to have LLMs write for you, but it won't be a merely idiosyncratic one. It will be what all the people who care about thinking well do. Not using LLMs to write for you won't be like not using Google Maps in a new city. It will be like choosing to run and lift weights, even though we now have machines that can transport us and lift weights for us. In fact, since it will be what all the smartest people do, it will probably be prestigious to write for oneself. Which in turn means more people will claim to do it than will actually do it.

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2070184265942548978

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2058844147092488401

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2058855820121498037

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2058871512451412457

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2058863028523659390

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2068994868412629467

https://paulgraham.com/writes.html

parent dang 17 days ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton