the author seems infatuated by AI and in that infatuation, fails to see that his logic does not hold:
Ai's improvement will never reach 100%-error-freeness. Those who work in the trenches know that (hint: heuristics-based). He claims as if AI improvement is algorithmics-based. Which it will never be.
At best, AI will assist in cases where human involvement might be tedious or (or risky, such as Japan sending those bots in radioactive waters post the quake). And even that, under human supervision.
Ai's improvement will never reach 100%-error-freeness. Those who work in the trenches know that (hint: heuristics-based). He claims as if AI improvement is algorithmics-based. Which it will never be.
At best, AI will assist in cases where human involvement might be tedious or (or risky, such as Japan sending those bots in radioactive waters post the quake). And even that, under human supervision.