> But I think the fundamental principle is that this approach messes with the distribution in ways that deviate from the trained model.
This. I want the model I'm paying for to be "pure". I don't Anthropic or anyone else messing around with it, especially not for idiotic reasons like facillitating AI stigmatization. The "safety" nonsense is obnoxious enough.
They should train the best possible model and let the weights speak for themselves, not degrade it into some perverted form to appease people who hate AI anyway.
This. I want the model I'm paying for to be "pure". I don't Anthropic or anyone else messing around with it, especially not for idiotic reasons like facillitating AI stigmatization. The "safety" nonsense is obnoxious enough.
They should train the best possible model and let the weights speak for themselves, not degrade it into some perverted form to appease people who hate AI anyway.