There are those who adapt, those who will keep moaning about it and finally those who believe it can do everything.
First one will succeed, second one will be replaced, third one is going to get hurt.
I believe this article and the people it mentions are mostly from the second category. Yet no one with all his mind can deny that ai makes writing code faster, not necessarily better but faster, and games at the end are mostly codes.
Of course ai is going to get pushed hard by your ceo, he knows that if he doesn't, another competitor who use it will be able to produce more games, faster and less expensive.
There are those who adapt, those who will keep moaning about it and finally those who believe it can do everything.
First one will succeed, second one will be replaced, third one is going to get hurt.
I believe this article and the people it mentions are mostly from the second category. Yet no one with all his mind can deny that ai makes writing code faster, not necessarily better but faster, and games at the end are mostly codes.
Of course ai is going to get pushed hard by your ceo, he knows that if he doesn't, another competitor who use it will be able to produce more games, faster and less expensive.