> If people don't equally well suspect `eval` then education attempts have seriously failed.
Haha yes, that statement was mostly made in jest. I would hope most people would be just as suspicious of an eval one liner with a singular emoji. Does make it slightly less suspicious than an equivalent eval which doesn't have 50 invisible bytes.
Good shout on fixing issues with eval in OSS--I think I might do that!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> If people don't equally well suspect `eval` then education attempts have seriously failed.
Haha yes, that statement was mostly made in jest. I would hope most people would be just as suspicious of an eval one liner with a singular emoji. Does make it slightly less suspicious than an equivalent eval which doesn't have 50 invisible bytes.
Good shout on fixing issues with eval in OSS--I think I might do that!