> As for how to move forward, (...) Either Linus takes the pull, and whatever Christoph says is irrelevant, or he doesn't, and R4L dies. Everything else is a waste of everyone's time and energy.
It does look like maintainers should have a "disagree and commit" mentality at some point, whatever decision they end up making.
I thought Rust in Linux was evaluated, discussed and agreed upon years ago. The fact that there are people still trying to sabotage it shows that they don't follow the "disagree and commit" principle.
They are more like "disagree and make the others lives a living hell until they bend to my will".
> As for how to move forward, (...) Either Linus takes the pull, and whatever Christoph says is irrelevant, or he doesn't, and R4L dies. Everything else is a waste of everyone's time and energy.
It does look like maintainers should have a "disagree and commit" mentality at some point, whatever decision they end up making.
I thought Rust in Linux was evaluated, discussed and agreed upon years ago. The fact that there are people still trying to sabotage it shows that they don't follow the "disagree and commit" principle.
They are more like "disagree and make the others lives a living hell until they bend to my will".