Comment

Comment by SketchySeaBeast

I don't know that getting more trees than you lost is a useful or effective measure against climate change. It's a good thing, certainly, but I imagine the amount of carbon we're pumping into the atmosphere requires more than a steady state of trees. I wonder how much of the world we'd need to cover with trees in order to offset our carbon production, certainly more than we've had during modern civilization.

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton