> Propping it up as dogmatic truth that must be trusted and never investigated is probably the most anti-scientific thing you can do.
Honestly, that's what all the science-denying cranks say. You may not be such a person, but you need to be aware of the mindset of many people making this claim.
With regards to the retardation of the spread of infectious disease, that is robust science. We've spent over 100 years developing and practicing it, too. Our success rate has been incredible.
Also, this wasn't even humankind's first rodeo with the SARS coronavirus. We knew what we needed to do, we failed to do it, and hundreds of thousands of Americans needlessly lost their life as a result. That's the nightmare.
Honestly, that's what all the science-denying cranks say. You may not be such a person, but you need to be aware of the mindset of many people making this claim.
With regards to the retardation of the spread of infectious disease, that is robust science. We've spent over 100 years developing and practicing it, too. Our success rate has been incredible.
Also, this wasn't even humankind's first rodeo with the SARS coronavirus. We knew what we needed to do, we failed to do it, and hundreds of thousands of Americans needlessly lost their life as a result. That's the nightmare.