When one of the first examples is:
> GPT-4 feature: ends of phrases related to price increases
and the 2/5s of the responses don't have any relation to increase at all:
> Brent crude, fell 38 cents to $118.29 a barrel on the ICE Futures Exchange in London. The U.S. benchmark, West Texas Intermediate crude, was down 53 cents to $99.34 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. -- Ronald D. White Graphic: The AAA
and
> ,115.18. The record reflects that appellant also included several hand-prepared invoices and employee pay slips, including an allegedly un-invoiced laundry ticket dated 29 June 2013 for 53 bags oflaundry weighing 478 pounds, which, at the contract price of $
I think I must be mis-understanding something. Why would this example (out of all the potential examples) be picked?
> GPT-4 feature: ends of phrases related to price increases
and the 2/5s of the responses don't have any relation to increase at all:
> Brent crude, fell 38 cents to $118.29 a barrel on the ICE Futures Exchange in London. The U.S. benchmark, West Texas Intermediate crude, was down 53 cents to $99.34 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. -- Ronald D. White Graphic: The AAA
and
> ,115.18. The record reflects that appellant also included several hand-prepared invoices and employee pay slips, including an allegedly un-invoiced laundry ticket dated 29 June 2013 for 53 bags oflaundry weighing 478 pounds, which, at the contract price of $
I think I must be mis-understanding something. Why would this example (out of all the potential examples) be picked?