> Meta released Llama-3 only three days ago, and it already feels like the inflection point when open source models finally closed the gap with proprietary models. The benchmarks show that Llama-3 70B matches GPT-4 and Claude Opus in most tasks, and the even more powerful Llama-3 400B+ model is still training.
I'm all for open models, but where do the benchmarks show that?
Looking at https://arena.lmsys.org/, Llama-3-70b-Instruct is ranked #5 while current GPT-4 models and Claude Opus are still tied at #1. Meanwhile, Llama-3-8b-Instruct is ranked #14
Would love to be corrected, but either way an article should include sources for these types of claims.
I'm all for open models, but where do the benchmarks show that?
The official page https://llama.meta.com/llama3/ does not show any comparisons with GPT-4 or Claude Opus
Looking at https://arena.lmsys.org/, Llama-3-70b-Instruct is ranked #5 while current GPT-4 models and Claude Opus are still tied at #1. Meanwhile, Llama-3-8b-Instruct is ranked #14
Would love to be corrected, but either way an article should include sources for these types of claims.