> calling the use of neural networks in statistical work "AI" is misleading at best.
Neural Networks are not considered AI anymore?
That just reinforces my thesis that "AI" is an ever sliding window that means "something we don't yet have". Voice recognition used to be firmly in the "AI" camp and received grants from even the military. Now we have that on wrist watches (admittedly with some computation offloaded) and nobody cares. Expert systems were once very much "AI".
LLMs will suffer the same treatment pretty soon. Just wait.
Neural Networks are not considered AI anymore?
That just reinforces my thesis that "AI" is an ever sliding window that means "something we don't yet have". Voice recognition used to be firmly in the "AI" camp and received grants from even the military. Now we have that on wrist watches (admittedly with some computation offloaded) and nobody cares. Expert systems were once very much "AI".
LLMs will suffer the same treatment pretty soon. Just wait.