Given that this is the internet and I don't know you, how can I distinguish a sane person making well founded claims backed by hidden evidence they won't share with me, and a crazy person just being paranoid and seeing conspiracy where there is none?
Usually the evidence is what makes the difference, but if you can't/won't share the evidence then what good are the accusations?
Usually the evidence is what makes the difference, but if you can't/won't share the evidence then what good are the accusations?