Comment Comment by oblio > I think it's just what you're used to.If most of the mainstream programs work the same way, there's an age old set of UI/UX axioms for developers of competitor programs:1. The users aren't wrong, <<you are wrong>>.2. If you think you aren't wrong, <<you're still most likely wrong>>.3. And if you still think aren't most likely wrong, <<show me your usability studies>>.Open source programs basically have 0 usability studies because they don't have money for them, so this argument basically dies at step 4:4. <<Shut the f** up user, I'm giving this away for free>>.:-) parent oblio 3 years ago
If most of the mainstream programs work the same way, there's an age old set of UI/UX axioms for developers of competitor programs:
1. The users aren't wrong, <<you are wrong>>.
2. If you think you aren't wrong, <<you're still most likely wrong>>.
3. And if you still think aren't most likely wrong, <<show me your usability studies>>.
Open source programs basically have 0 usability studies because they don't have money for them, so this argument basically dies at step 4:
4. <<Shut the f** up user, I'm giving this away for free>>.
:-)