Well, as he himself points out - while the account was in her name, it was the children (who are not criminals as far as I know) who were using it. His argument is very weak in comparing them - he even had a goal lines up with the recent NatWest/Farage stuff - but instead he picked on a woman who probably hasn't been in the public consciousness for several year.
Also why should institutions not be allowed to express values? By your logic if you believe a baker should not be allowed to bake a gay cake, then a bank should be able to debank customers.
Also why should institutions not be allowed to express values? By your logic if you believe a baker should not be allowed to bake a gay cake, then a bank should be able to debank customers.