He's arguing against debanking people and organisations for expressing their political views, by comparing it to a heinous crime that doesn't get a person debanked, and pointing out the double standard.
The interesting question is to what extent should people have their ability to partake in modern society restricted based on their political views. It's a freedom of expression issue, like the ones tech companies have to grapple with when they close people's accounts for similar policy reasons.
The interesting question is to what extent should people have their ability to partake in modern society restricted based on their political views. It's a freedom of expression issue, like the ones tech companies have to grapple with when they close people's accounts for similar policy reasons.