> 1. The author is bad at prompting. There are many ways to reduce hallucinations and provoke better thinking paths for the model.
Does "Provoke better thinking paths" mean re-rolling the dice until you find some hack specific to chatGPT that 'just works' or is there something more rigorous behind this?
Does "Provoke better thinking paths" mean re-rolling the dice until you find some hack specific to chatGPT that 'just works' or is there something more rigorous behind this?