>>If answers are good, keep them. If they're bad, downvote them.
>This doesn't work at scale... with LLM's all of a sudden there is a huge influx of mediocre content
The GP's answer may not work at scale - however LLM detection doesn't work at all. So the only semi-workable solution is aggressive filtering and banning users who post trash (LLM or not).
Also, there's a need to think about score and trust mechanisms - the same mechanisms which can be used for filtering also provide an incentive for LLM use, is there a way to avoid that?
>When someone posts a answer I assume they actually ran the code, and can verify the result
I wish we lived in a world where this assumption wasn't naive.
>This doesn't work at scale... with LLM's all of a sudden there is a huge influx of mediocre content
The GP's answer may not work at scale - however LLM detection doesn't work at all. So the only semi-workable solution is aggressive filtering and banning users who post trash (LLM or not).
Also, there's a need to think about score and trust mechanisms - the same mechanisms which can be used for filtering also provide an incentive for LLM use, is there a way to avoid that?
>When someone posts a answer I assume they actually ran the code, and can verify the result
I wish we lived in a world where this assumption wasn't naive.