You’re saying other cities’ air quality experience is totally irrelevant in some posts and then making a direct comparison to policies that other cities have implemented in this post. It doesn’t seem a consistent position to me.
IMO, what other cities do (and the results they get) is relevant when discussing what’s good, bad, or practically possible.
IMO, what other cities do (and the results they get) is relevant when discussing what’s good, bad, or practically possible.