> Fair, but this autonomy seems to be tenuous at the moment and grows more so as time passes. You must be aware what the US is willing to do when it comes to national interest. Chips are on par with energy/oil, possibly regarded as even more important economically and militarily.
> I'm sure there will be a carrot and a stick, but if this happens, an offer will be made that TSMC can't refuse.
I comprehend this U.S.-centric viewpoint. However, from the perspective of an independent nation state, this narrative sends a cautionary message: 'Beware of creating a product that becomes too integrated into the U.S. supply chain, because you will get rich but risk forfeiting your right to self-determination.'
It is somewhat disappointing to see that, on this forum where more nuanced discussions are expected, this is the default (and appreciated) perspective.
> I'm sure there will be a carrot and a stick, but if this happens, an offer will be made that TSMC can't refuse.
I comprehend this U.S.-centric viewpoint. However, from the perspective of an independent nation state, this narrative sends a cautionary message: 'Beware of creating a product that becomes too integrated into the U.S. supply chain, because you will get rich but risk forfeiting your right to self-determination.'
It is somewhat disappointing to see that, on this forum where more nuanced discussions are expected, this is the default (and appreciated) perspective.