Comment

Comment by dudeinhawaii

Consider this, a legal firm rather than using a search mechanism to scan 100,000 documents for specific terms - could instead say something like:

"You are an auditor/lawyer looking for suspicious conversations or patterns of deceit by employees of company Z. I will feed you documents and you will give your analysis of each document or collections of documents. Pay special attention to X Y Z. Consider these sorts of actions as deceptive (a,b,c,d). If you find anything of note, create a summary of the findings in the form ['wording indicates deceptive intent', document 37, page 93].".

You'd then feed it 20 pages at a time and for less than $100 you've scanned a mountain of legal documents in a way in which you'd normally require a team of legal assistants and 100s of hours of work.

Again, I'm not a lawyer but I can conjure this very simple example that I could implement in a month if I had the time. At this point I think you're just squeezing me for ideas.

Perhaps you should explain what the technology is marketed as that you see as lying or misrepresenting. That would make this more productive.

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton