> I've been able to use GPT-4 extensively for coding, writing, comprehension, tone analysis, home repairs, automation, debugging vague errors, and a host of other things.
Is there any objectivity or measurements in your analysis?
> at the very least we're looking at quite striking incremental improvements
I'm not even sure what this should mean. This sounds like something I would find in a marketing pamphlet.
> "yo, why is the floor dirty? Get cleanin"
From.. possible striking improvements to the legal profession.. to.. a conversational mode embedded in my Roomba. You've actually perfectly captured the gulf between what this technology is marketed to be and what it is barely capable of doing.
Is there any objectivity or measurements in your analysis?
> at the very least we're looking at quite striking incremental improvements
I'm not even sure what this should mean. This sounds like something I would find in a marketing pamphlet.
> "yo, why is the floor dirty? Get cleanin"
From.. possible striking improvements to the legal profession.. to.. a conversational mode embedded in my Roomba. You've actually perfectly captured the gulf between what this technology is marketed to be and what it is barely capable of doing.