>Is it simulated to the level where you could give it some visual stimulus and observe the actions it is trying to take?
No way.
First, this mapping doesn't tell us how the synapses are regulated - if we could 'run' this the weights would stay fixed forever and that's not how a brain works.
Second, there must be some neurons dedicated to chemical management, and they'd go haywire unless you found a way to deal with them. It's possible the hardware/software is so intertwined it can't be separated. Or maybe it's just complex, regardless the mapping is of limited use here.
Third, you're assuming that the synapses/axons are the only thing that matters. It may well be this is true, but having other processes being involved has not yet been entirely ruled out. If they are, the mapping is incomplete.
Lastly, we don't have the computational ability just yet to simulate even the mapping itself.
No way.
First, this mapping doesn't tell us how the synapses are regulated - if we could 'run' this the weights would stay fixed forever and that's not how a brain works.
Second, there must be some neurons dedicated to chemical management, and they'd go haywire unless you found a way to deal with them. It's possible the hardware/software is so intertwined it can't be separated. Or maybe it's just complex, regardless the mapping is of limited use here.
Third, you're assuming that the synapses/axons are the only thing that matters. It may well be this is true, but having other processes being involved has not yet been entirely ruled out. If they are, the mapping is incomplete.
Lastly, we don't have the computational ability just yet to simulate even the mapping itself.