IANAL. You probably should get a lawyer ASAP.
Linkedin vs hiQ was about the ability to scrape public data. (https://calawyers.org/privacy-law/ninth-circuit-holds-data-s...)
Pretty much everyone agrees that you need to follow the Linkedin terms if you are logged in, and those say no scraping. Your site has examples of scraping data from logged-in pages.
Normally you could say "it's just a tool, there are legit uses, go after the users", like in the Betamax case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Unive....
By including examples of breaking the Linkedin ToS on your site though, you might have opened yourself up to some kind of claim, maybe tortuous interference. I don't really know though, you should get a lawyer to look for you.
Again, I am not a lawyer, do not trust me, I am just some idiot who likes to read about copyright law about the internet on the internet. Get your own lawyer.
Linkedin vs hiQ was about the ability to scrape public data. (https://calawyers.org/privacy-law/ninth-circuit-holds-data-s...)
Pretty much everyone agrees that you need to follow the Linkedin terms if you are logged in, and those say no scraping. Your site has examples of scraping data from logged-in pages.
Normally you could say "it's just a tool, there are legit uses, go after the users", like in the Betamax case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Unive....
By including examples of breaking the Linkedin ToS on your site though, you might have opened yourself up to some kind of claim, maybe tortuous interference. I don't really know though, you should get a lawyer to look for you.
Again, I am not a lawyer, do not trust me, I am just some idiot who likes to read about copyright law about the internet on the internet. Get your own lawyer.