> I would happily quote some top western news media, only if it would not be completely one-sided. There is no democracy anymore there, where you paint one-sided picture and block other sides news sources.
That kind of argument doesn't work when you're listening to literally state-run media of the enemy. You could compare and contrast RT versus say Voice of America or Radio Free Europe, but not versus independent reporting. RT is by definition "one-sided". They have only one interest, the Russian government interest.
> I would argue that it is unethical, and mostly about warmongering and not stress release.
You call the praising of liberators and freeing of people from the oppression of their murderers and rapists as "warmongering"?
> Either that or you live in a media bubble so different, that our opinions exactly opposite. Thankfully, it is just an opinion, and not a ground truth.
If all you listen to is RT and related outlets, then it's no wonder you have lost the ability for independent thought.
That kind of argument doesn't work when you're listening to literally state-run media of the enemy. You could compare and contrast RT versus say Voice of America or Radio Free Europe, but not versus independent reporting. RT is by definition "one-sided". They have only one interest, the Russian government interest.
> I would argue that it is unethical, and mostly about warmongering and not stress release.
You call the praising of liberators and freeing of people from the oppression of their murderers and rapists as "warmongering"?
> Either that or you live in a media bubble so different, that our opinions exactly opposite. Thankfully, it is just an opinion, and not a ground truth.
If all you listen to is RT and related outlets, then it's no wonder you have lost the ability for independent thought.