mlindner

The entire economy will become part of the tech sector so this is kind of self-defeating.

At this point I'm so jaded that I can't trust anything in this as its from vanity fair of all places. Not a place known for quality journalism.

> with the most notorious pedophile on earth?

Go look at the emails. It kinda shows Elon was clueless about what the island was about.

Also he wasn't notorious at the time.

> What exactly are you defending here?

Ah you're going to accuse me of defending pedophilia now? Figures with your type.

A bunch of the Model S production vehicles did ship with the capability. It was removed from later models. So that part absolutely shipped. Tons of cars on the road to this day still have the hardware in the car to support it.

And they did build one pilot station that did the battery swaps and did some swaps with real owners cars, but drivers didn't like the idea so they abandoned it.

And yes to my point, I said Tesla product, namely something that is sold to customers as is. So yeah it's relevant.

Still hasn't failed to ship either.

He didn't even go to the island (or want to go to the island other than to have a party).

JB Straubel married in 2013. Unless you're 13 years old, JB Straubel isn't your father.

That kind of liar is what I would expect of someone who goes around claiming Elon's a Nazi though.

Thank you.

There was no wire rig either as there's nothing above the car...

The preorders converted over. It's the same product in effect.

What do you think this product reveal was for? The roadster.

That wasn't a product they were going to sell to customers.

This was a product reveal for the new second generation Roadster though?

Cybercab is operating already on the roads? They're building the factory for mass producing them right now.

Optimus robot is still in development.

I think calling it a scam is a crazy thing to say. Tesla has never not (eventually) shipped a product they said they would .

Also yes you can legally sell it. Whether you can legally operate it is a different question.

You can't formally verify the soundness of something that inherently necessarily relies on hardware implementations that themselves could be faulty.