If you're arguing the government should be able to break up any company it likes, for any reason it decides, then you're basically arguing against capitalism, private property, freedom of speech and association, and most of the separation of powers and concerns that democracies are supposed to be built upon.
"ought to" is a dangerous cudgel to put in the hands of a government or a self-righteous mob, and "monopoly" was what everyone was arguing should be the standard, but I guess now it's open season.
"ought to" is a dangerous cudgel to put in the hands of a government or a self-righteous mob, and "monopoly" was what everyone was arguing should be the standard, but I guess now it's open season.